Skip to content

Trainability and buyer-readiness scorecard

Use this scorecard as an evidence-status worksheet. It helps an owner decide what to document next before a review.

It is not a universal quality number, a model-performance test, an estimate, or a Rightmark output. The word trainability is a working label for this worksheet, not a claim that the collection will train a particular system. This scorecard is an editorial aid, not an additional product capability.

  • The Rightmark Buyers page is the public source for the current scoping, sample, and assessment boundary. Rightmark,

Updated

On this page

Evidence matrix

Evidence matrix (table)
AreaEvidence to assembleStatusNext action
ProvenanceSource system, period, and evidence referencesReady / Needs evidence / Out of scope / Not applicable[action]
StructureFormat, units, identifiers, and relationshipsReady / Needs evidence / Out of scope / Not applicable[action]
Labels and metadataLabel definitions, fields, and missingness notesReady / Needs evidence / Out of scope / Not applicable[action]
HistoryVersion or time coverage and change notesReady / Needs evidence / Out of scope / Not applicable[action]
Rights and scopeOwnership, terms, notice, consent, and exclusions evidenceReady / Needs evidence / Out of scope / Not applicable[action]
Sample readinessRedacted sample shape and review instructionsReady / Needs evidence / Out of scope / Not applicable[action]
Verification environmentReproducible local checks or source-system notesReady / Needs evidence / Out of scope / Not applicable[action]
Privacy handlingSensitive classes, exclusions, access, and retentionReady / Needs evidence / Out of scope / Not applicable[action]
DeliveryFormat, cadence, deletion, and handoff requirementsReady / Needs evidence / Out of scope / Not applicable[action]

Needs evidence is a useful result. It means the next action is known or can be assigned. Do not sum the statuses into a number without a separately reviewed method.

Download the blank scorecard (CSV)

Technical evidence for code

When the collection is code, the current Repo Check route can provide bounded technical signals about code shape, tests, tooling, CI, history, and disclosure risks. Use the installed tool and its current schema. Do not copy internal thresholds into this general worksheet and do not treat a tool signal as a rights decision.

Buyer-readiness evidence

The current Rightmark buyer flow asks for a data family, specification, volume and unit, license shape, timeline, organization, and work email. A review can also need a sample shape, security requirements, delivery cadence, and deletion terms. Record each item as Ready, Needs evidence, or out of scope. A complete worksheet does not create a buyer, establish demand, or guarantee acceptance.

Safe blank example

Collection: Dataset A
Review purpose: [description]
Rights evidence: Needs evidence
Structure and format: Needs evidence
Sample shape: Not applicable
Privacy handling: Needs evidence
Delivery and deletion: Needs evidence
Next review owner role: [role]

The example is synthetic and intentionally incomplete. It contains no data, price, customer, buyer, or relationship.

Boundaries

This worksheet cannot establish ownership, prove absence of prior public exposure or contamination, provide legal clearance, set a price, or forecast demand. It cannot replace a technical evaluation or an appraisal. Health-related material remains research and status only. Do not use this page as health intake or submit a health sample.

General information, not legal advice.

Sources

  1. Rightmark: Buyers
  2. Rightmark: Repo Check

Use the appraisal path for a separate evidence review.

The scorecard is preparation, not an appraisal.